By Ruben Mirzakhanyan
The infamous plenary session of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Armenia in 1937 is a factually documented historical event. Among the distinguished participants who arrived in Yerevan for this session were Anastas Mikoyan, a senior member of the Soviet leadership; Georgy Malenkov, Head of the Union-wide Central Committee’s department (who later assumed the role of the head of the Soviet Government following Stalin’s death); as well as Mikhail Litvinov and Lazar Artman, both figures associated with the People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs (NKVD). Additionally, Lavrentiy Beria travelled from Tbilisi to attend.
The session lasted for four days, following an officially declared break. Ultimately, this event precipitated widespread political repression across the country. While these occurrences have been extensively analysed in scholarly literature, a less known yet intriguing detail has recently emerged: Mikoyan actively participated in the first day of the plenary session but was conspicuously absent for the remainder, reappearing only at the end of the session. It has now come to light that during his absence, he secretly crossed the Armenian-Turkish border to meet with Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. The contents of their discussion remain classified to this day. However, it is plausible that the plenary session served as a mere pretext to obscure significant foreign policy arrangements. The fact that an Armenian statesman was entrusted with these discussions is noteworthy.
More than two decades later, following the conclusion of the Second World War, Mikoyan – who had been the first high-ranking Soviet official to visit the United States in the early 1930s – played a crucial role in diplomatic negotiations between the two emerging superpowers. During his meeting with then US Vice President (later President) Richard Nixon, Mikoyan addressed the condition of Armenians in Turkey, expressing his concerns in that respect. Official records of these discussions are extant. It is evident that in both instances, substantial attention was devoted to the plight of Armenians in the region. The undeniable outcome of these efforts was the safeguarding of the physical security of the Armenian people.
In light of the foregoing discussion, it becomes evident that diplomatic negotiations yield results when conducted by political figures of exceptional stature – individuals who wield genuine power, possess intellectual acumen, and act with responsibility.
Stas Namin and Andrey Rubanov’s documentary work Anastas Mikoyan: From Ilyich to Ilyich is dedicated to the political figure of Anastas Mikoyan, an eminent statesman of the Soviet era. The book has been published in multiple editions in Moscow, later translated into Armenian, and published in Yerevan. The translation was undertaken by one of Armenia’s leading historians, Dr. Khachatur Stepanyan, Doctor of Historical Sciences and professor. The involvement of a scholar of such high calibre in producing the Armenian edition, which incorporates various primary sources, lends the work considerable academic credibility. The Armenian translation includes bibliographic annotations and a rigorous scholarly apparatus, reflecting the expertise of a distinguished historian.
One of the co-authors, Stas Namin, is not only a cultural figure of international renown but also Anastas Mikoyan’s grandson.
Anastas Mikoyan had ten grandchildren, but Stas was his most cherished one. Mikoyan himself remarked that this was due to two reasons: first, Stas was a boy; second, he was born to an Armenian mother. Consequently, Stas Namin’s work represents not only an invaluable scholarly contribution but also a deeply personal endeavour.
The book provides a comprehensive examination of Mikoyan’s life, covering:
His childhood and early years (1906–1917);
His role in the Baku Commune (March 1917–September 1919);
His professional activities in Nizhny Novgorod and Rostov (1919–1928);
His contributions to the organisation of the Soviet Union’s food industry (1930–1941);
His efforts during and after the Great Patriotic War (1941–1953);
His pivotal role in the de-Stalinization process as the Soviet Union’s crisis manager in diplomacy (1953–1964);
His tenure as Chairman of the Supreme Soviet Presidium and his final years (1963–1978).
As a committed Marxist, Mikoyan was an active participant in the Bolshevik movement in both Caucasus and Russia. He was imprisoned five times for his political undertakings. His contributions to the Baku Commune were particularly ппроминент. Notably, he named his children after the executed Baku Commissars. It is said that Stalin occasionally referred to him as the “twenty-seventh commissar,” an epithet intended to highlight Mikoyan’s survival amid the purge of the Baku Commissars, thereby keeping his inner circle in a constant state of apprehension. However, first-hand accounts, including those of Mikoyan himself and Suren Shahumyan (son of Stepan Shahumyan), provide a more nuanced perspective on these events.
Mikoyan’s exceptional administrative aptitude was most evident in his food supply management, internal and external trade arrangements, and the coordinated material and technical provisioning of the Soviet Union. During the Great Patriotic War, his role was decisive in organising food supplies for the Red Army and overseeing the relocation of industrial enterprises to the eastern regions of the USSR – an unprecedented logistical operation in world history. It was customary for high-ranking Soviet officials to receive awards on solemn occasions. Mikoyan was conferred the title of the top-ranked Hero of Socialist Labour in 1943 in recognition of his outstanding merits.
Yorumlar kapatıldı.